When discussing the “literature of the future”, it is absolutely necessary to acknowledge the fears, concerns, and anxieties of both the past and present. Without the context of where we are and where we have been, speculating about the future of humanity becomes a pointless exercise in futility, grounded in nothing but the fantastical. Former student Tom Britt’s 2016 pre midterm essay “A Gift to the Dead and a Warning to the Living” affirms this notion of the necessity of the literature of the future to be grounded in the context of both the past and present. Necessities, however, can be problematic, as the idea that literature MUST contain something seems to limit the very scope of literature. If topics must be covered, and universals are established, then visions can be compromised. Literature of the future addresses this concern in the form of multiple distinct, concurrent narratives: the creation/apocalypse narrative, the evolution narrative, and the alternative future narrative. These narratives are all concerned with similar issues, but they take different approaches to said issues, creating a discourse in which we can discuss the future through a variety of different, but equally valid, interpretive lenses.
The creation/apocalypse narrative and the evolution narrative are the two visions of the future which are most directly concerned with the issues of the past and present. Creation narratives, by their very definition, have to consider the context of humanity’s past. If we wish to explore where we came from, we must acknowledge where we have actually been. One of the biggest themes in creation/apocalypse narratives is the concept of revelation, or the idea of some sort of ultimate understanding divined through the intervention of the supernatural. This concept is fully on display in the scriptural texts covered in the course. Genesis and Revelation (particularly Revelation) are the word of God himself, and offer a vision of humanity’s beginning and end. Many of the themes present in these scriptural texts are reflected in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower. These narratives are valid, but they are lacking in empirical evidence, leading to subjective interpretations which can weaken the strength of their arguments.
On the other hand, evolutionary narratives are often directly concerned with the empirical. Evolutionary narratives have their own sort of revelations, but they are divined not through the supernatural but the empirical. Their claims are based on observation, and assert that the story of creation, and destruction, resemble structure like circles and spirals. According to the evolutionary narrative, humanity’s beginning, and its demise, can be traced through objective and empirical evidence. The final narrative we have covered in the course, the alternative future narrative, takes ideas and concepts from the other two to create a sort of far more flexible hybrid narrative. Alternative future narratives combine the empirical and supernatural in order to form a better-rounded and complete vision of the future.