"Each person shares 99.99% of the genetic material of every
other human being. In terms of variation, people from the same race can be more
different than people from different races."
Scholars, demographers, and educators increasingly question the categorization of humans in terms of "race," instead favoring terms like "ethnic group," "ethnicity," or "cultural group." On the other hand, the USA as a "classless" society has traditionally relied on race as a marker for distinct identities and communities that in some regards serve the same structuring purposes as race.
Rationale for not thinking of race:
Race divides people by typologies that are falsely divisive and over-simplified. There's only one race—the human race—and the diversity of human appearance and behavior exceeds that of whatever "races" we may have learned from our cultural groups.
The familiar concept of "the world's races" was articulated primarily by German intellectuals in the late 1700s. At least in popular culture, the names of these groups became associated with skin color, e.g. Caucasian (white), Mongoloid (yellow), Negroid or Ethiopian (black), and American [Indian] (red).
The science behind such classifications was always questionable, but such exercises in biological anthropology appealed to negative and positive stereotypes.
Identity groups often think visually and symbolically, so that the continuing appeal of racial thinking cannot be denied even as it is increasingly undermined by scientific research.
Modern genetics has exposed the superficiality of visible differences by revealing what vastly complex genetic heritages any modern human possesses, especially since improvements in transportation and communications but even before. See Henry Louis Gates, notes on African American genetics.
Ethnic group, ethnic identity, or ethnicity: an ethnic group may be defined less by race, biology, genetics, than by culture, behavior, traditions, circumstances, or especially language.
Race or descent may be and often is a factor in ethnic identity, but as only one component that may be balanced by other factors like class, locale, language.
Ethnic group or ethnicity is now being used in academic discourse more often than race.
Race has biological or genetic connotations;
Examples of racial minorities:
Much recent research suggests that "race" is not based in biological or genetic nature but is instead a human invention that has gained acceptance as common sense based on superficial differences. There's really only one race: the human race. The genetic variability within a "race" is far greater than the genetic difference between races.
Overall, ethnicity is a broader, more flexible and inclusive term than race, plus it avoids some sensitive areas of race; e. g., if you discuss the "genetics" or blood-lines that constitute race, inevitably you're talking about sex.
In the case of African America, for instance, discussion of "race" opens not only to genetic inheritance from Africa but genetic inheritance from white slavemasters or slavedrivers who fathered children by black slave women. How much are schoolchildren or their parents ready to talk about that?
Therefore a growing tendency to talk about "ethnic groups" instead of "races."
This trend is also compelled by recent emergence of Hispanic and Latino presence in North America.
Hispanic or Latino is not a race but an ethnic group.
Hispanic identity tends not to be identified by race (though race may be a factor) but by language(s), religion, geography.
A "Hispanic" may be a Hispanic and be of European descent, of American Indian descent, of African descent, of Asian descent . . . or any combination of these.
Plus European descent doesn't simply mean Spanish but may include German, Irish, Italian, and / or Portuguese, among others.
Painter, Nell Irvin. The History of White People. NY: Norton, 2010.
389-90 The dark
of skin who also happen to be rich, . . . and the light of skin who are
beautiful are now well on the way to inclusion. Is this the end of race in
391 It was this science of molecular genetics that drove the longest nail into the theory of race.
391 J. Craig
Venter, head of Celera Genomics: “Race is a social concept, not a scientific
one. We all evolved in the last 100,000 years from the same small number of
tribes that migrated out of
391 Each person shares 99.99% of the genetic material of every other human being. In terms of variation, people from the same race can be more different than people from different races.